uniQure « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Hemofilie B; nog steeds on track?

317 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 » | Laatste
[verwijderd]
0
Fix gen is al lang bekend en er wat aan sleutelen is vector kan vele kanten op dus er zijn plenty mogelijkheden een FIX gen casette in elkaar te sleutelen. De een zal beter werken dan de andere zeker in combinatie met AAV5 vector.
Prof. Dollar
0
quote:

Antoni schreef op 26 januari 2014 10:56:

www.medscape.com/viewarticle/818239_6
Ah, voor toegang moet je een account aanmaken op Medscape. Kan je de abstract posten? TNX.
[verwijderd]
0
Ik heb ook geen toegang, maar via google heb ik dit.

Gene Therapy and Improving Access to Treatment

Gene therapy is under active investigation in hemophilia B in 3 studies, all employing FIX transgene expressing serotype-8 pseudotyped adenovirus-associated virus (AAV8) vectors. One of the trials, conducted at University College London (UCL) and sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis), has reported on 10 patients with stable FIX levels of 1%-6%, some out to more than 40 months.[20] "Many of these patients got to therapeutic levels to the point that they did not have to use factor," Dr. Josephson noted. The 2 patients treated at the higher AAV vector dose level had the highest response in terms of FIX levels; they also showed an immune response to the AAV vector associated with a rise in transaminases, but both responded to a short course of prednisone.[21] "This study is very impressive," Dr. Josephson commented to Medscape, "but I am guessing that the FDA is going to want to look at these patients for a long time before they are going to consider licensing this as a treatment. The potential toxicities and the risks are not something that can be evaluated in a short period, but as a method for getting FIX levels into a therapeutic range, there is good evidence that they can do that with AAV8 vectors."

"I think this is an incredibly exciting time to be in hemophilia care," Dr. Josephson told Medscape. "We are at a point where I know that my patients who don't have inhibitors can have a really good quality of life. And when the longer-acting factors become available, we are going to have more tools. But this is true only for patients living in developed countries," he stressed. "We still have many needs to meet, and one of the most pressing is to improve access to clotting factor concentrates in the developing world," he declared. "There are many thousands of people worldwide who do not have access to factor, so for the community, the biggest challenge is making factor available to those patients."

Prof. Dollar
0
Bedankt! Wel een interessante opmerking van die arts, "but I am guessing that the FDA is going to want to look at these patients for a long time before they are going to consider licensing this as a treatment.".

Met andere woorden: het zou niet verkeerd zijn een lobby te starten om dergelijke behandelingen onder strenge voorwaarden toch goed te keuren, want deze optie kent de FDA niet en de EU wel - zie de EU Glybera goedkeuring.
flosz
0
Volledig art. voor de liefhebber:

Hemophilia: Current Management, Unmet Needs
Linda Brookes, MSc, Neil C. Josephson, MD
January 23, 2014

Gene Therapy and Improving Access to Treatment
Gene therapy is under active investigation in hemophilia B in 3 studies, all employing FIX transgene expressing serotype-8 pseudotyped adenovirus-associated virus (AAV8) vectors. One of the trials, conducted at University College London (UCL) and sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis), has reported on 10 patients with stable FIX levels of 1%-6%, some out to more than 40 months.[20] "Many of these patients got to therapeutic levels to the point that they did not have to use factor," Dr. Josephson noted. The 2 patients treated at the higher AAV vector dose level had the highest response in terms of FIX levels; they also showed an immune response to the AAV vector associated with a rise in transaminases, but both responded to a short course of prednisone.[21] "This study is very impressive," Dr. Josephson commented to Medscape, "but I am guessing that the FDA is going to want to look at these patients for a long time before they are going to consider licensing this as a treatment. The potential toxicities and the risks are not something that can be evaluated in a short period, but as a method for getting FIX levels into a therapeutic range, there is good evidence that they can do that with AAV8 vectors."
"I think this is an incredibly exciting time to be in hemophilia care," Dr. Josephson told Medscape. "We are at a point where I know that my patients who don't have inhibitors can have a really good quality of life. And when the longer-acting factors become available, we are going to have more tools. But this is true only for patients living in developed countries," he stressed. "We still have many needs to meet, and one of the most pressing is to improve access to clotting factor concentrates in the developing world," he declared. "There are many thousands of people worldwide who do not have access to factor, so for the community, the biggest challenge is making factor available to those patients."

Prophylaxis in Children: Start Early, Engage Them in Sports
Over the last generation, Dr. Josephson noted, treatment for hemophilia has changed dramatically, moving to giving coagulation factor replacement (FVIII or FIX) as prophylaxis to prevent bleeding rather than episodically on demand for the treatment of acute bleeds. Prophylaxis is focused on patients with severe hemophilia (FVIII/FIX levels < 1%) because it was recognized that patients with moderate (1%-5%) or mild (> 5%) hemophilia have a much lower frequency of joint bleeds and a lower likelihood of developing severe hemophilic arthropathies. Definitive proof of the efficacy of primary prophylaxis came from 2 randomized controlled trials, the Joint Outcome Study[2] and ESPRIT (Evaluation Study on Prophylaxis: a Randomized Italian Trial),[3] Dr. Josephson recalled. The significant outcomes from these trials were fewer bleeding episodes, less joint damage, and improvements in quality-of-life measures in patients treated with prophylaxis compared with those receiving episodic treatment with recombinant FVIII (rFVIII).
"Start early" is the principle for prophylaxis in hemophilia, according to Dr. Josephson. "The best outcomes are seen in children who are started on prophylaxis before 2.5-3.0 years of age," he stated. High-dose protocols (25-40 IU/kg 3 times per week) seem to give the greatest benefit. Good outcomes have also been obtained with intermediate-dose protocols (15-25 IU/kg 2-3 times per week), although more joint bleeds occurred compared with high-dose prophylaxis.[4] An alternative approach is tailored prophylaxis, which is being investigated in an ongoing Canadian study that initiates primary prophylaxis with rFVIII at 50 IU/kg once weekly, escalating to 30 IU/kg twice weekly and then to 25 IU/kg every other day for bleeding symptoms. At 5 years, Dr. Josephson noted, 40% of patients in this study still required only once-weekly infusions and only 28% were on every-other-day treatment, and all patients had normal joints by physical exam and little evidence of arthropathy on plain x-rays.[5] Although most of the data on early prophylaxis are in patients with hemophilia A, "I think it is reasonable to apply the same principles for treatment to hemophilia B patients," Dr. Josephson suggested.
Dr. Josephson also stressed the importance of encouraging children with hemophilia to participate in sports activities, coordinated with prophylaxis dosing. "In the past, children with hemophilia were encouraged to be inactive because of concerns that participating in sports was risky and led to bleeding, but studies have shown that children with hemophilia who are active have no worse arthropathy than those who are inactive," he stated. "The vast majority of bleeds are unrelated to athletics, even in children participating in 'high-impact' activities, and the risk can be mitigated by prophylactic factor infusions

flosz
0
Prophylaxis in Adults: Discuss Options, Consider Lower Doses

"We know definitively that we can prevent almost all bleeding – decreasing bleeding frequency by > 90% as well as the severity of bleeding episodes – by continuing prophylaxis into adulthood or starting prophylaxis in adults previously managed with episodic treatment," Dr. Josephson stated. "My approach with adults tends to be to discuss it as an option," he told Medscape. "Many of them are reluctant, so I ask them to give it a try for 1-2 months and then they can make a decision about whether it is worth it. But kids tend to do what their parents tell them to do, whereas adults are going to do what they want to do -- it is their decision in the end," he admitted.
"We know that about one third of patients on primary prophylaxis will permanently switch to episodic treatment as young adults," Dr. Josephson told Medscape. He continued, "One issue for adults is that there are no 'iron-clad' data similar to those from the Joint Outcome Study or ESPRIT to demonstrate that a patient is going to have a better outcome on prophylaxis." Evidence for the benefits of starting prophylaxis in adults first came from the Orthopedic Outcome Study, a longitudinal, uncontrolled study that found that over 6 years of follow-up, the patients who had less progression of established arthropathies were those on full-time prophylaxis.[7] Two recent sequential treatment studies also showed decreases in bleeding rates with prophylaxis compared with episodic treatment,[8,9] but improvements in joint function or quality of life remain to be confirmed.
The ongoing Secondary Prophylaxis With rFVIII Therapy in Severe Hemophilia A Adult and/or Adolescent Subjects Compared to That of Episodic Treatment (SPINART) study is expected to yield quantitative information on both of those outcomes, Dr. Josephson predicted. SPINART is a 3-year trial, the longest to date in adult prophylaxis, in which patients are randomly assigned to receive rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU/kg, 3 times weekly) or on-demand treatment. An interim report of 84 patients at a median follow-up time of 1.7 years showed a 93% decrease in the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients on the prophylaxis arm.[10] In addition, bleeding events that occurred on prophylaxis were reported as significantly less severe. The final results of SPINART will include evaluations of index joints by MRI and physical examination and health-related quality-of-life measures. "It is going to be very important to find out how prophylaxis affected joint outcomes, as measured by MRI, and quality of life in these patients," Dr. Josephson told Medscape.
Dr. Josephson believes that bleeding in adults could be controlled with less than standard dosing (20-40 IU/kg FVIII 3 times per week). "It is critical to note that the studies in adults all used high-dose prophylaxis regimens that were based on our dosing of FVIII in children." he pointed out, noting that because FVIII half-life is significantly longer in adults, lower doses could be used at the same intervals. "I believe that for any patient on prophylaxis, we could probably halve the dose and get a reasonable trough level (> 1%) that would protect against bleeding. That would go a long way toward closing the gap between the cost of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens," Dr. Josephson suggested to Medscape. Studies have shown that patients on prophylaxis use 2-3 times the amount of FVIII.
It is also important to individualize dosing strategies based on observed bleeding rates and activity schedules. "I am an adult hematologist, so in truth my patients have been treating their hemophilia longer than I have. We talk about treatment. But the fact of the matter is, they are dosing the factor and are in the best position to determine what works for them. They really make the final decision on how they are treated," Dr. Josephson emphasized.

Risks of Inhibitor Formation
"Inhibitor formation is the major complication from treating patients with factor concentrate," Dr. Josephson stated. Alloimmune inhibitory antibodies to FVIII (inhibitors) develop in about 25%-30% of patients with severe hemophilia A, typically developing in young children, with initial detection after a median of 14-16 treatment days. Inhibitors to FIX in hemophilia B are much less common, occurring in only 3% of patients.
In hemophilia A, the F8 gene mutation is the most significant risk factor for inhibitor development, with null mutations conferring a significantly higher risk than missense mutations.[11] Other risk factors identified include polymorphisms in immune regulatory genes and association with specific HLA Class II alleles, although these findings have not been consistent across all studies. "It is clear that race-associated factors do impact inhibitor formation such that African Americans and Hispanics have a much higher rate of inhibitor formation, although the exact etiology of that is unclear," Dr. Josephson added. Treatment-related factors that influence inhibitor formation include a higher risk in patients requiring an early intensive factor dosing, and "there appears to be some protection against inhibitor formation from prophylaxis, especially in patients who have good risk genotypes."
"A very controversial issue is whether some factor products are more immunogenic than others," Dr. Josephson reminded. "In particular, there has been a lot of concern that the recombinant factors used today may be more immunogenic than the plasma-derived factors -- and in particular the plasma-derived factors that are rich in von Willebrand factor (vWF)," he recalled. However, "most of the studies that point to those kinds of signals have been retrospective studies, and so we have not had great data to support that hypothesis," he cautioned.
A study of data from the RODIN (Research Of Determinants of INhibitor Development Among Previously Treated Patients with Hemophilia) prospective registry showed no difference in inhibitor formation between recombinant and plasma-derived FVIII in 574 previously untreated patients.[12] "There was some indication that a second-generation, full-length product might be associated with a slightly higher risk for inhibitor formation, but that could be a chance finding or due to some potential treatment bias and needs to be confirmed," Dr. Josephson cautioned. "The SIPPET (Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers) trial, which is randomly assigning previously untreated patients to treatment with either recombinant or vWF-rich plasma-derived concentrates, may help to resolve the immunogenicity issue more definitively, and we eagerly await the results," he added.[13]
flosz
0

New Challenges: Comorbidities, Cancer
Nowadays, patients with hemophilia in the United States are presenting new challenges with age-related comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and cancer, as well as the comorbidities associated with hemophilia.[17] "There are a lot of issues with aging in hemophilia," Dr. Josephson told Medscape. "A lot of what I take care of now in clinic in caring for my patients is getting them through heart surgery, cancer surgery, prostate surgery, which are all associated with aging," he noted.
"Obesity is also a big issue as are the diabetes, heart disease, and other complications that go with it," he added, noting that hemophilia patients tend to have higher BMIs. There is increasing interest these days in trying to address those problems, he noted, pointing to a trial led by a colleague at Puget Sound Blood Center, Barbara A. Konkle, MD, Director of Clinical and Translational Research, that is investigating whether there is an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease in older men with moderate to severe hemophilia A and B. "There is some thought that there is a protective effect, but results in studies to date have been conflicting," Dr. Josephson explained.

New Options Improve, Complicate Therapy
Since the introduction of the recombinant factors in the 1990s, research into improving treatment has focused mainly on development of factor replacement therapies with extended half-life. Dr. Josephson noted that a number of long-lasting factor concentrates are currently in late-stage development (phase 3), including 4 rFVIII products: N8-GP (NN7088; Novo Nordisk), BAY94-9027 (Bayer), rFVIII-Fc (Biogen Idec), and BAX855 (Baxter), and 3 rFIX products: N9-GP (NN7999, Novo Nordisk), rFIX-Fc (Biogen Idec), and rFIX-FP (CSL654, CSL Behring).[18,19]
"It is going to be both an exciting and a challenging time for both patients and doctors, because in the next few years there are going to be many, many choices," Dr. Josephson predicted for Medscape. "These products have not been compared head-to-head, so decisions are not going to be made because one product has a better efficacy or safety profile compared with another. I think people are probably going to look at a lot of different aspects of these products, and in the end they will make a choice that is not completely informed, because they don't have all the information," he cautioned. Dr. Josephson recalled that when recombinant factors first became available, the differences between them were minor, whereas there are significant differences between how the new long-acting factors are produced, so the efficacy of each may differ in individual patients.
Another question is whether patients already on treatment should switch to the new factors. "If you have a patient who is completely happy with what they are doing, I wouldn't, as a provider, encourage them to switch," Dr. Josephson advised. "I might explain that there are these other products out there with potential benefits, but that we also don't have the track record that we have with the product that they are already using," he said. "So, unless there is a compelling reason to switch, I personally won't be encouraging patients to switch just because something has 1.5 times the half-life." Dr. Josephson noted that the new rFIX products have a dramatic extension in half-life and therefore may be more attractive to patients because of that, "but I don't think anybody says they clot better; they just do it for a longer period of time," he commented.

Gene Therapy and Improving Access to Treatment
Gene therapy is under active investigation in hemophilia B in 3 studies, all employing FIX transgene expressing serotype-8 pseudotyped adenovirus-associated virus (AAV8) vectors. One of the trials, conducted at University College London (UCL) and sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis), has reported on 10 patients with stable FIX levels of 1%-6%, some out to more than 40 months.[20] "Many of these patients got to therapeutic levels to the point that they did not have to use factor," Dr. Josephson noted. The 2 patients treated at the higher AAV vector dose level had the highest response in terms of FIX levels; they also showed an immune response to the AAV vector associated with a rise in transaminases, but both responded to a short course of prednisone.[21] "This study is very impressive," Dr. Josephson commented to Medscape, "but I am guessing that the FDA is going to want to look at these patients for a long time before they are going to consider licensing this as a treatment. The potential toxicities and the risks are not something that can be evaluated in a short period, but as a method for getting FIX levels into a therapeutic range, there is good evidence that they can do that with AAV8 vectors."
"I think this is an incredibly exciting time to be in hemophilia care," Dr. Josephson told Medscape. "We are at a point where I know that my patients who don't have inhibitors can have a really good quality of life. And when the longer-acting factors become available, we are going to have more tools. But this is true only for patients living in developed countries," he stressed. "We still have many needs to meet, and one of the most pressing is to improve access to clotting factor concentrates in the developing world," he declared. "There are many thousands of people worldwide who do not have access to factor, so for the community, the biggest challenge is making factor available to those patients."
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/818239_6
[verwijderd]
0
Mevrouw Katherine A. High heeft ook mee gewerkt aan die studie van Jude,
alleen die werkt nu bij Spark therapeutics en ze zullen waarschijnlijk AAV 8 gaan gebruiken!!
Prof. Dollar
0
quote:

Dogder schreef op 3 april 2014 14:59:

Mevrouw Katherine A. High heeft ook mee gewerkt aan die studie van Jude,
alleen die werkt nu bij Spark therapeutics en ze zullen waarschijnlijk AAV 8 gaan gebruiken!!
Zonder concurrentie waarschijnlijk ook geen markt; in dat opzichte is het goed dat er meerdere potentiële aanbieders zijn. Buiten dat denk ik dat de markt groot genoeg is voor meer dan 1 aanbieder.

Dat Spark mogelijk niet kiest voor AAV 5 en uniQure wel heeft vermoedelijk te maken met het geclaimde alleenrecht van uniQure op AAV 5. Daarnaast bouwt uniQure voort op eerdere resultaten met AAV 5 (hetgeen een marktaanvraag kan bespoedigen). Daarbij mag je resultaten uit AAV 5 niet zomaar generaliseren naar AAV 8. Het is een misverstand om te denken dat een hogere AAV (wat betreft het serotype) automatisch beter is dan een lagere. We moeten onderzoeksresultaten afwachten.
[verwijderd]
0
Glybera werkt mat AAV1 als ik me niet vergis. De verschillende AAVs hebben verschillende 'voorkeursweefsels' en AAV5 gaat graag naar de lever en dat is goed voor stollingseiwitten. Ook upscaling blijft ern belangrijk criterium. Daarin hebben de AAV8 mensen geen trackrecord.
[verwijderd]
0
Ik vind veel onderzoeken waarbij aav 5 niet goed werkt in ieder geval minder dan aav 8. Zal Uniqure een ander soort aav 5 hebben?

Bronnen:
bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/co...
www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1...
[verwijderd]
0

www.cnbc.com/id/101618663

Research and Markets: Global Hemophilia B Therapeutic Pipeline Review 2014
2 Hours Ago
Business Wire











COMMENTSStart the Discussion

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/c5zzvf/hemophilia_b) has announced the addition of the "Global Hemophilia B Therapeutic Pipeline Review 2014" report to their offering.

This report provides comprehensive information on the therapeutic development for Hemophilia B, complete with comparative analysis at various stages, therapeutics assessment by drug target, mechanism of action (MoA), route of administration (RoA) and molecule type, along with latest updates, and featured news and press releases. It also reviews key players involved in the therapeutic development for Hemophilia B and special features on late-stage and discontinued projects.

The report enhances decision making capabilities and help to create effective counter strategies to gain competitive advantage. It strengthens R&D pipelines by identifying new targets and MOAs to produce first-in-class and best-in-class products.

Companies Involved in Therapeutics Development

Baxter International Inc.
Biogen Idec Inc.
AstraZeneca PLC
Emergent BioSolutions Inc.
Sangamo BioSciences, Inc.
Novo Nordisk A/S
rEVO Biologics
Pfizer Inc.
OPKO Health, Inc.
ReGenX Biosciences, LLC
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CSL Limited
Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.
Amarna Therapeutics B.V.
Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Inc.
LFB Biotechnologies, S.A.S
UniQure NV
AlphaMab Co., Ltd

Drug Profiles

coagulation factor IX-Fc (recombinant)
coagulation factor IX (recombinant)
GNR-001
trenonacog alfa
coagulation factor IX-Fc (recombinant)
trenonacog alfa
CSL-654
NN-7999
LR-769
BAX-817
nonacog alfa biosimilar
AMT-060
AskBio-009
Gene Therapy For Hemophilia B
CSL-689
PF-05280602
concizumab
Gene Therapy To Activate Factor IX For Hemophilia B
MOD-9017
MOD-5017
ALN-AT3
eptacog alfa biosimilar
Factor IX
ZFP Nucleases for Hemophilia
IB1-007
Long Acting Blood Coagulation Factor IX
Long Acting Coagulation Factor VIIa
CB-2679d
MOD-5014
Gene Therapy For Hemophilia B
AZ-10047130
AZ-10776241
SVF-VIIa

For more information visit www.researchandmarkets.com/research/c...

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager.
press@researchandmarkets.com
U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716
Sector: Pharmaceuticals

Source: Research and Markets
Tex Mex
0
De St Jude studie op clinical trials.gov is weer geupdate op 23 juni (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00979238?term=hemophilia+B&rank=18).

primary completion date: nog steeds June 2015.

Nieuw is: in plaats van 3 nu 4 verschillende doseringen. Om te testen of er bij een hogere dosis ook een hogere expressie is?

To assess the safety of systemic administration of a novel self complementary AAV vector in adults with severe hemophilia B at up to four different dosage levels. [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Tex Mex
0
Weet niet zeker of deze link al eens op een ander draadje is geplaatst, maar hij past ook wel op dit hemofilie draadje, denk ik. Mooi verhaal, gebracht door Amit Nathwani, een van de pioniers op het gebied van de gentherapie voor hemofilie B. Reeds een indrukwekkende weg afgelegd om op het punt te komen waar UCL/ St. Jude staan m.b.t. een gentherapeuticum voor hemofilie B. UniQure (heeft exclusieve licentie voor de AAV8 vector) komt ook nog voor in een van de dia's. Er wordt ook gesproken over een vergoeding van GBP 150.000,- per patient per jaar dat de gen-expressie boven de 1% blijft. Maar ik betwijfel of dat al ergens op gebaseerd kan zijn.
Mooie afsluiting ook: heb het al eerder gezegd: alle credits naar de patienten, die overigens wel op een zeer zorgvuldige wijze lijken betrokken in de studies. Bovendien begrijp ik nu beter waarom de inclusie van patienten zoveel tijd kost: Om redenen van veiligheid/zorgvuldigheid worden er tijdens de studie nooit patienten tegelijk behandeld, maar alleen achtereenvolgend.

Trek wel even een klein uurtje uit om de hele video te zien:

www.euvolution.com/futurist-transhuma...
[verwijderd]
1
Gene therapy provides safe, long-term relief for patients with severe hemophilia B

Gene therapy pioneered by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, University College London and the Royal Free Hospital provides men with hemophilia B reliable relief from the bleeding disorder

Memphis, Tennessee, November 19, 2014

Gene therapy developed at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, University College London (UCL) and the Royal Free Hospital has transformed life for men with a severe form of hemophilia B by providing a safe, reliable source of the blood clotting protein Factor IX that has allowed some to adopt a more active lifestyle, researchers reported. The results appear in the November 20 edition of The New England Journal of Medicine.

In this study, participants received one of three doses of gene therapy that used a modified adeno-associated virus (AAV) 8 as the vector to deliver the genetic material for making Factor IX. The vector was administered as a single infusion into a peripheral vein in the arm of each participant.

Factor IX levels rose in all 10 men with severe hemophilia B following gene therapy and have remained stable for more than four years. Overall, episodes of spontaneous bleeding declined 90 percent. Use of Factor IX replacement therapy dropped about 92 percent in the first 12 months after the treatment with the investigational therapy.

In the six participants who received the highest gene therapy dose, levels of the blood-clotting protein increased from less than 1 percent of normal levels to 5 percent or more. The increase transformed their disease from severe to mild and enabled participation in sports such as soccer without the need for Factor IX replacement therapy or an increase in the risk of bleeding. Episodes of spontaneous bleeding and use of Factor IX replacement therapy declined for these patients more than 94 percent in the next 12 months.

Liver enzymes rose in four of the six patients who received the highest dose, possibly due to an immune response against the vector. The men had no symptoms and remained otherwise healthy. Their liver enzymes returned to the normal range following brief treatment with steroids.

Hemophilia B is caused by a mutation in the Factor IX gene that can result in dangerously low levels of the essential clotting protein. The disorder affects about 1 in 30,000 individuals, mostly men. For those with severe disease marked by Factor IX levels less than 1 percent of normal, scrapes and bumps are medical emergencies. Painful episodes of spontaneous bleeding can result in crippling joint damage early in life and an increased risk of potentially fatal bleeding within the brain.

“This study provides the first clear demonstration of the long-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy,” said senior author Andrew Davidoff, M.D., chair of the St. Jude Department of Surgery. “The results so far have made a profound difference in the lives of study participants by dramatically reducing their risk of bleeding.”

The paper’s first and corresponding author, Amit Nathwani, M.D., Ph.D., added: “The data we are reporting mark a paradigm shift in treatment of hemophilia B and lay the groundwork for curing this major bleeding disorder.” Nathwani is a faculty member at the UCL Cancer Institute, Royal Free Hospital and NHS Blood and Transplant. “The results also provide a solid platform for developing this gene transfer approach for treatment of other disorders ranging from other congenital clotting deficiencies like hemophilia A to inborn errors of metabolism such as phenylketonuria.”

Prior to receiving gene therapy, seven of the 10 men received Factor IX replacement therapy at least once a week in order to prevent bleeding episodes. Others used replacement therapy as needed to halt bleeding or prior to surgeries.

Since joining the trial, four of the seven men ended the routine Factor IX injections. None have suffered spontaneous bleeding despite increased physical activity. “Some patients have not required clotting factor injections for more four years, which has been life changing,” Nathwani said. Researchers estimated that overall spending on Factor IX replacement therapy for study participants is down more than $2.5 million.

Factor IX is normally produced by liver cells. AAV8 was selected for the vector because the virus infects liver cells but does not cause disease in humans or integrate into human DNA. This study was restricted to patients not previously infected with AAV8 to eliminate the need for immune-suppressing drugs to protect the vector from possible immune system attack.

The vector was developed by the St. Jude-UCL collaboration and produced at the Children’s Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), LLC, on the St. Jude campus. The Children’s GMP operates under U.S. government-approved manufacturing guidelines and is also complaint with European Union manufacturing requirements. It produces highly specialized medicines, vaccines and other products that are in the early stages of development.

Twelve men have now joined the on-going Phase I/II safety and efficacy trial. Half were treated at UCL and half at St. Jude. Discussions are underway about expanding the trial to include younger patients with hemophilia B. Meanwhile work continues to improve and expand use of the vector for treatment of hemophilia A, another more common bleeding disorder.

Other authors are Ulrike Reiss, Catherine Y.C. Ng, Junfang Zhou, Maria Cancio, Christopher Morton, Deokumar Srivastava and Arthur Nienhuis, all of St. Jude; John Gray and James Allay, both formerly of St. Jude; Edward G.D. Tuddenham, Pratima Chowdary, Jenny McIntosh, Anne Riddell and Jun Pie, all of Royal Free NHS Trust; Cecilia Rosales, Marco Della Peruta, Elsa Lheriteau, Nishal Patel and Deepak Raj, all of UCL Cancer Institute; Savita Rangarajan and David Bevan, both of St. Thomas Hospital, London; Michael Recht, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Ore.; Yu-Min Shen, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Kathleen Halka, Temple Clinic, Temple, Texas; Etiena Basner-Tschakarjan, Federico Mingozzi and Katherine High, all of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia; and Mark Kay, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

In the U.S., the research was funded by a grant (HL094396) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health; the Assisi Foundation of Memphis; Howard Hughes Medical Institute and ALSAC. In the U.K., the research was founded in part by the Medical Research Council, The Katharine Dormandy Trust; NHS Blood and Transplant; UCLH/UCL NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; The Royal Free Hospital Charity and a NIHR Programme Grant.

bilbo3
0
Dit is dus het onderzoek waarnaar Uniqure verwijst in hun presentatie van afgelopen week en waar zij op voortborduren, waarbij ze de AAV8 vector vervangen door de eigen AAV5 vector.
Lijkt mij wederom een goed artikel, jammer dat Uniqure niet wordt genoemd.
[verwijderd]
0
uit een ander draadje, om hier maar even verder over te praktiseren;

Prof. Dollar 1 dec 2014 om 19:06
0
Vandaag hield uniQure een investor day. Hun promopraat was overduidelijk gericht op het warm maken van nieuwe investeerders om in te stappen. Niks mis mee. En gezien de vandaag gepubliceerde kwartaalcijfers ook hard nodig. Ik ben benieuwd of een nieuwe aandelenuitgifte na de tussentijdse onderzoeksresultaten van Hemophilia B midden 2015 gaat plaatsvinden of dat dit ervoor al noodzakelijkerwijs moeten gebeuren. Vandaar mijn behoudende waardering.
====

Ik denk dat UniQure het beste eraan doet om Hemofilie te partneren waardoor het milestones/royalties etc. tegemoet kan zien zonder dat hun cashburn er zwaar onder lijdt...hoe verder men komt, des te meer kosten/hoger de cashburn.

Er zijn simpelweg té veel targets op het gebied van gentherapie om aan te werken en alles in eigen beheer te houden. UniQure zou er goed aan te doen spin in het web van de gentherapie te zijn ipv te mikken op één of enkele kaskrakers die voor 100% uit eigen keuken komt.

Een bekende Quote-500 persoon zei: "Wie niet kan delen, kan ook niet vermenigvuldigen!"
M.a.w.; QURE moet de basis verbreden en zoveel mogelijk samenwerkingen aangaan om zoveel mogelijk potjes op het vuur te hebben staan. In biotech zit al zoveel risico, dat spreiding noodzakelijk is voor voortbestaan en het blijven aantrekken van financiële middelen.
317 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Markt vandaag

 AEX
882,63  +12,36  +1,42%  26 apr
 Germany40^ 18.177,90 +1,45%
 BEL 20 3.874,87 +0,44%
 Europe50^ 5.011,70 +0,10%
 US30^ 38.211,61 0,00%
 Nasd100^ 17.698,09 0,00%
 US500^ 5.095,29 0,00%
 Japan225^ 38.345,55 0,00%
 Gold spot 2.337,95 0,00%
 EUR/USD 1,0693 -0,34%
 WTI 83,64 0,00%
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer

Stijgers

EBUSCO HOLDING +9,33%
NX FILTRATION +8,77%
ASMI +7,26%
Alfen N.V. +5,89%
PostNL +3,82%

Dalers

SIGNIFY NV -11,28%
Wereldhave -7,62%
AMG Critical ... -5,77%
IMCD -4,90%
ABN AMRO BANK... -4,19%