Ed Verbeek schreef op 7 juli 2020 16:02:
[...]Laat De Hond nu juist uit dat boek van Wells uit de jaren '50 het onderzoek aangeleverd hebben, dat virus besmetting via aerosolen bevestigt!!!
Lees even mee:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"When it came to the animal experiments with the tuberculosis bacterium and the influenza vaccine. In both trials there were results that Wells himself says: “
truly astonishing” (page 119). There was a big difference between the animals that were “offered” the big drops and the animals that were “offered” the micro drops.
The difference was a factor of 16 times.
32 of the 33 animals that inhaled the aerosols got a lung infection. None of the animals that were offered the large drops showed a form of swallowed infection after 6 weeks.In short:
larger drops do not cause an infection with tuberculosis, but it happens entirely through airborne microdroplets, which are inhaled by the animal (man) for a while and then “nestle” in the lungs.
But yes, one will object, tuberculosis is a bacterium.
But then on page 119 we see the following about experiments with mice:
“Influenza virus inhaled in large and small drops DUPLICATED the effect observed in experiments with tuberculosis”.
Mice that inhaled the aerosols died quickly. While the mice that had come into contact with the large droplets were much better off.It then goes on to say that
the influenza virus inhaled in microdroplets was much more contagious than if those drops had been removed from the air and
inserted into the nose.
The rest of the chapter describes other tests with other infectious diseases, such as group C Streptococci. And the results are always the same.
The small particles can penetrate directly into the lungs and there, if they are in sufficient numbers, very much household. Larger particles/droplets do not succeed or to a much lesser extent,
Wells states.www.maurice.nl/2020/06/22/wells-prove...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De bespotters van De Hond kunnen deze informatie accepteren.
Of eventueel betwisten dat besmetting via aerosolen kan, en bewijzen aanvoeren dat besmetting vaker via droplets plaats vindt.
Graag een inhoudelijke reactie luchtschip.
Denk je dat Wells er naast zat?(Overigens is het een
hardnekkige fabel dat het onderzoek van Wells uit de jaren '30 zou hebben aangetoond dat er besmetting via droplets plaats vindt. Hij heeft slechts aangetoond dat droplets landen binnen een straal van ca 1.5m. Dat is dus iets anders dan besmetting via droplets. Snap je het verschil? )